From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Randle

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Apr 1, 2011
CIVIL NO. 10-784-GPM (S.D. Ill. Apr. 1, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 10-784-GPM.

April 1, 2011


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This action came before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. On February 11, 2011, the Court denied the motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and ordered Plaintiff to pay the full filing fee of $350.00 by March 3, 2011. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee as ordered. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of this Court. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); see generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 03/31/11


Summaries of

Carter v. Randle

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Apr 1, 2011
CIVIL NO. 10-784-GPM (S.D. Ill. Apr. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Carter v. Randle

Case Details

Full title:KEVEN LEE CARTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL P. RANDLE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

Date published: Apr 1, 2011

Citations

CIVIL NO. 10-784-GPM (S.D. Ill. Apr. 1, 2011)

Citing Cases

Julian v. Woolbert

Code, § 2773. Such is the declared effect of the statute, though such insolvency proceedings did not, ipso…

Castleberry v. Hollingsworth

The causes for removal of administrators as set forth in section 5789 of the Code are the only grounds for…