From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 1999
260 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 19, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when a door in her apartment shut on her hand. The defendant New York City Housing Authority, the owner of the building, was granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm.

The court properly determined that the door at issue was not an inherently dangerous instrument simply because it lacked a door stop ( see, Tjepkema v. Rochdale Meat Mkt., 238 A.D.2d 333; Green v. New York City Hous. Auth., 82 A.D.2d 780, affd 55 N.Y.2d 966; White v. Board of Educ., 249 App. Div. 520, 521, mod on other grounds 250 App. Div. 777).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carter v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 1999
260 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Carter v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:KIM CARTER, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 237

Citing Cases

Lopes v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, as…