From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Liberty Ins. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 5, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01779-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 5, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01779-APG-BNW

08-05-2020

DARLENE CARTER and DAVID BIANCO, Plaintiffs v. LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Denying Motion to Amend

[ECF Nos. 18, 21]

On July 17, 2020, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I deny plaintiff Darlene Carter's motion to amend. ECF No. 21. The plaintiffs did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler's report and recommendation (ECF No. 21) is accepted and the plaintiffs' motion to amend (ECF No. 18) is DENIED.

DATED this 5th day of August, 2020.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Carter v. Liberty Ins. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 5, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01779-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Carter v. Liberty Ins. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE CARTER and DAVID BIANCO, Plaintiffs v. LIBERTY INSURANCE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 5, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01779-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 5, 2020)