From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Lawson

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 27, 2017
220 So. 3d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D17–0937

06-27-2017

Anthony D. CARTER, Petitioner, v. Richard S. LAWSON, Respondent.

Anthony D. Carter, pro se, Petitioner. Richard S. Lawson, pro se, Respondent.


Anthony D. Carter, pro se, Petitioner.

Richard S. Lawson, pro se, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We hereby grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The circuit court shall rule on the pending motion to hear and rule, motion to compel answers to request for admissions and interrogatories, and amended motion to compel answers to interrogatories within a reasonable time, not to exceed sixty days from issuance of mandate in this cause. Because we are confident that the circuit court will issue a ruling, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Carter v. Lawson

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 27, 2017
220 So. 3d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Carter v. Lawson

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY D. CARTER, Petitioner, v. RICHARD S. LAWSON, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jun 27, 2017

Citations

220 So. 3d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)