From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Infinity Broadcasting Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 3, 2005
Case No.: CV-F-04-6618 REC/SMS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2005)

Opinion

Case No.: CV-F-04-6618 REC/SMS.

October 3, 2005

Thornton Davidson #166487, Scott C. Hawkins #207236, THORNTON DAVISON ASSOCIATES, Fresno, California, Attorney for Plaintiff, PAUL S. CARTER.

MAUREEN E. McCLAIN, Attorney for Defendant, INFINITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION.


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41 (a)


Plaintiff, Paul S. Carter and Defendant, Infinity Broadcasting Corporation, have agreed to dismiss this matter in its entirety with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a). Each party shall bear its own fees and costs.

The parties seek the Court's approval of dismissal of this action with prejudice, through the order listed, infra.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carter v. Infinity Broadcasting Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 3, 2005
Case No.: CV-F-04-6618 REC/SMS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2005)
Case details for

Carter v. Infinity Broadcasting Corporation

Case Details

Full title:PAUL S. CARTER Plaintiff, v. INFINITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 3, 2005

Citations

Case No.: CV-F-04-6618 REC/SMS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2005)