From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Hi Top Flower Wholesale Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1998
255 A.D.2d 412 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 16, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the entry of an appropriate judgment.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Hi Top Flower Wholesale Corp. (hereinafter the corporate defendant) and compelling the plaintiffs to accept service, inter alia, of the corporate defendant's answer. The corporate defendant failed to comply with a prior conditional order of the court, dated April 30, 1997, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a judgment upon the corporate defendant's default in answering unless that defendant served its answer "within 10 days hereof". Furthermore, the corporate defendant did not submit opposition papers offering any excuse for its failure to comply with the conditional order, or demonstrating the existence of a meritorious defense to this action. Under these circumstances, the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a judgment based upon the corporate defendant's default in answering should have been granted ( see, Michaud v. City of New York, 242 A.D.2d 369; Green v. Kolur, 234 A.D.2d 267).

O'Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carter v. Hi Top Flower Wholesale Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1998
255 A.D.2d 412 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Carter v. Hi Top Flower Wholesale Corp.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS CARTER, III, et al., Appellants, v. HI TOP FLOWER WHOLESALE CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 412 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 589

Citing Cases

Weitzenberg v. Nassau County Department of Recreation & Parks

We reverse. Initially, we note that the defendants' failure to timely comply with the conditional order of…

Susquehanna Valley Bank v. Loomis

There are no doubt cases in which an indorser is liable without notice of non-payment. Bickerdike v. Bollman…