From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 14, 2012
1:12-cv-00829-AWI-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2012)

Opinion

1:12-cv-00829-AWI-JLT (HC)

08-14-2012

DAVID CARTER, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

and

DIRECTING CLERK TO SERVE

THE COURT OF APPEALS


(Docs. 17, 18)

Petitioner is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On July 23, 2012, judgment was entered dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus. On August 13, 2012, petitioner filed a notice of appeal and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of an appeal. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Carter v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 14, 2012
1:12-cv-00829-AWI-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Carter v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:DAVID CARTER, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 14, 2012

Citations

1:12-cv-00829-AWI-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2012)