From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Fiberboard Corp. (In re Asbestos Prods. Liab. Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 29, 2012
MDL DOCKET NO. 875 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2012)

Opinion

MDL DOCKET NO. 875

02-29-2012

In re: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. IV) BENJAMIN HILL CARTER, JR. v. FIBERBOARD CORP., et al.


Consolidated Under


E.D. PA Civil Action No.

09-cv-74351

This ruling applies to all of the cases in which Dr. Millette has been offered as a "rebuttal" expert as identified in Exhibit "A."

Transferor Court: S.D. Georgia 91-00164

AND NOW, this 28 day of February, 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

Defendant CSX Transportation's Motion to Strike the Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. James Millette [See Docket #23] is GRANTED. This expert report fails to directly rebut the Defendant's experts and Plaintiffs have presented no justification for a delayed expert report.

BY THE COURT:

_____________

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.


Summaries of

Carter v. Fiberboard Corp. (In re Asbestos Prods. Liab. Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 29, 2012
MDL DOCKET NO. 875 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Carter v. Fiberboard Corp. (In re Asbestos Prods. Liab. Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. IV) BENJAMIN HILL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

MDL DOCKET NO. 875 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2012)