From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Div. of Corr.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 11, 2019
No. 18-7193 (4th Cir. Apr. 11, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7193

04-11-2019

KENNETH EUGENE CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS; TOM CHANDLER, CFCI, Defendants - Appellees, and WARDEN DAVID BALLARD, Defendant.

Kenneth Eugene Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly M. Bandy, Natalie C. Schaefer, SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:17-cv-03743) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Eugene Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly M. Bandy, Natalie C. Schaefer, SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Eugene Carter appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Div. of Corr., No. 2:17-cv-03743 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 13, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Carter v. Div. of Corr.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 11, 2019
No. 18-7193 (4th Cir. Apr. 11, 2019)
Case details for

Carter v. Div. of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH EUGENE CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 11, 2019

Citations

No. 18-7193 (4th Cir. Apr. 11, 2019)