From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jan 7, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv61 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv61

01-07-2019

JASON CARTER, #1824592 v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID


MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING THE REPORT OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner Jason Carter, a prisoner confined at the Michael Unit within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, proceeding pro se, filed this federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the illegality of his conviction. The case was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge, the Honorable Judge John D. Love.

On November 9, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report, (Dkt. # 15), recommending that Carter's petition be dismissed with prejudice and that he be denied a certificate of appealability sua sponte. A copy of this Report was sent to Carter's address, return receipt requested. The docket demonstrates that Carter received a copy of the Report on November 20, 2017, (Dkt. # 16). However, to date, no objections to the Report have been filed.

Consequently, Carter is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Auto. Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243 (1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law."). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. # 15), is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. Further it is

ORDERED that Petitioner Carter's federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice and he is denied a certificate of appealability sua sponte.

So Ordered and Signed

Jan 7, 2019

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Carter v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jan 7, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv61 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2019)
Case details for

Carter v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:JASON CARTER, #1824592 v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Jan 7, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv61 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2019)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Here, the appropriate limitations provision is § 2244(d)(1)(A), which states that the statute of limitations…