From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Cox

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 27, 2023
2:20-CV-1322-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-CV-1322-KJM-DMC-P

01-27-2023

CLYDE DAVID CARTER, Plaintiff, v. B. COX, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, ECF No. 31, based on Plaintiff's failure to notify the Court of a change of address as required under the Local Rules. According to Defendant, various status reports filed with the Court and served on Plaintiff at his address of record have been returned undeliverable. By way of this order served on Plaintiff, the Court will ascertain on the record whether mail is being delivered and warn Plaintiff that failure to file an opposition to Defendant's motion may be construed in the Court's discretion as consent to the relief requested which, in this case, is dismissal of the entire action. See Local Rule 230(c), (1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carter v. Cox

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 27, 2023
2:20-CV-1322-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Carter v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE DAVID CARTER, Plaintiff, v. B. COX, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 27, 2023

Citations

2:20-CV-1322-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2023)