From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Chrysler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 26, 2012
Civil Action No.: 6:11-CV-967 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 6:11-CV-967

09-26-2012

TYREIK S. CARTER, Plaintiff, v. MARK CHRYSLER, Individually and as Deputy Sheriff of the County of Oneida, New York, RICHARD ROE, a fictitious name intended to represent the name of one or more Deputy Sheriffs of the Oneida County Sheriff's Department, Oneida County, whose identities are as yet unknown, THE COUNTY OF ONEIDA, NEW YORK, EMILY KELLER, Individually and as a Police Officer of the City of Rome, New York, HOLLIE KENNEDY, individually and as a Police Officer of the City of Rome, New York, JOHN DOE, a fictitious name intended to represent the name of one or more officers of the Police Department of the City of Rome, New York, whose identities are as yet unknown, and the CITY OF ROME, NEW YORK, Defendants.

David R Walsh, IV, Esq. Barth Sullivan Behr Attorney for Defendants Mark Chrysler, Richard Roe and The County of Oneida Daniel N. Cafruny, Esq. Stephen L. Lockwood, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Tim Bendic, Esq. Office of the Corporation Counsel Attorneys for Defendants City of Rome


STIPULATION OF DISCONTINUANCE


(NAM/DEP)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, the attorneys of record for all the parties to the above entitled action, that whereas no party hereto is an infant, incompetent person for whom a committee has been appointed or conservatee and no person not a party has an interest in the subject matter of the action, the above entitled action be, and the same hereby is discontinued on the merits with prejudice, without costs to either party as against the other. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the clerk of the Court. ______________
David R Walsh, IV, Esq.
Barth Sullivan Behr
Attorney for Defendants
Mark Chrysler, Richard Roe and
The County of Oneida
______________
Daniel N. Cafruny, Esq.
Stephen L. Lockwood, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED: ______________
Tim Bendic, Esq.
Office of the Corporation Counsel
Attorneys for Defendants
City of Rome and Hollie Kennedy

______________

David E. Peebles

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Carter v. Chrysler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 26, 2012
Civil Action No.: 6:11-CV-967 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Carter v. Chrysler

Case Details

Full title:TYREIK S. CARTER, Plaintiff, v. MARK CHRYSLER, Individually and as Deputy…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No.: 6:11-CV-967 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 26, 2012)