From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Bradley

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
Nov 6, 1925
106 So. 350 (Fla. 1925)

Opinion

Opinion Filed November 6, 1925.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval County; George Couper Gibbs, Judge.

Affirmed.

Axtell Rinehart, for Plaintiff in Error;

Giles J. Patterson, for Defendant in Error.


This is an action by the plaintiff in error against the administrator of the estate of Frederick G. Bradley for damages for the conversion by Bradley in his lifetime of two diamond rings belonging to the plaintiff.

The rings were deposited by the plaintiff with Bradley as security for the payment of a note for six thousand dollars made by the plaintiff in favor of Bradley, dated April 27, 1917, and payable twelve months after date. During the first half of the year 1919 the note was paid. Bradley died in July, 1920, and had the rings in his possession several months before he died.

There is no evidence to show that Bradley never restored the rings to the plaintiff, or that he otherwise converted them.

The plea of not guilty, which was interposed by the defendant, operated as a denial of the commission of the wrong alleged by taking, damaging or converting the property mentioned in the declaration. See Rule 75 Circuit Courts, Law Actions. The burden was upon the plaintiff to show the conversion of the rings by Bradley.

The defendant moved for an instructed verdict in his behalf. The motion was granted and the plaintiff took a nonsuit and writ of error.

Affirmed.

WEST, C. J., AND TERRELL, J., concur.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur in the opinion.


Summaries of

Carter v. Bradley

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
Nov 6, 1925
106 So. 350 (Fla. 1925)
Case details for

Carter v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:RUBY HOLMES CARTER, Plaintiff in Error, v. PETER B. BRADLEY, AS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division A

Date published: Nov 6, 1925

Citations

106 So. 350 (Fla. 1925)
106 So. 350

Citing Cases

Sharps v. Sharps

She denied commission of the wrong alleged, and the plaintiffs had the burden of proof to show the…

Harbeson Lbr. Co. v. Anderson

e injury in the condition that it was at the time of the injury and it was used thereafter in that condition…