From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Barrington

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 28, 1984
319 S.E.2d 894 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

68569.

DECIDED JUNE 28, 1984.

Action for damages. Fayette Superior Court. Before Judge Miller.

Charles V. Vrono, Leonard N. Steinberg, for appellants.

Patrick J. Fox, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the defendant in a malicious prosecution action. The defendant swore out a criminal arrest warrant against John Alan Carter on October 4, 1982, charging him with reckless driving. Later that day, he swore out a second warrant against John Alan Carter's father, Anthony John Carter, charging him with use of abusive and obscene language. On March 7, 1983, grand jury indictments were returned on both charges. However, a nolle prosequi was subsequently entered on each indictment, with the plaintiffs paying all court costs. The Carters subsequently filed this suit.

The assistant district attorney who handled the two criminal cases testified by affidavit that the nolle prosequis were entered pursuant to a settlement agreement negotiated by the attorney representing the plaintiffs, whereby, in addition to paying the court costs, the plaintiffs agreed to refrain from filing any civil action against the defendant for malicious arrest, false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, or abuse of process based on the defendant's conduct in swearing out the warrants and prosecuting the charges. The plaintiffs do not deny that their defense attorney entered into such an agreement with the assistant district attorney on their behalf, but they assert that their attorney was without authority to settle on these terms. Held:

"[W]here the dispute as to an agreement is not between opposing parties but is, rather, between the attorney and client over the attorney's authority, and where the opposite party is ignorant of any limitation upon the attorney's authority, the client will be bound by his attorney's actions." Brumbelow v. Northern Propane Gas Co., 251 Ga. 674, 676 ( 308 S.E.2d 544) (1983). It follows that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to the defendant. Accord Smith v. Otwell, 51 Ga. App. 741 (1) ( 181 S.E. 493) (1935); Coggins v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 47 Ga. App. 314 ( 170 S.E. 308) (1933).

Judgment affirmed. Pope and Benham, JJ., concur.

DECIDED JUNE 28, 1984.


Summaries of

Carter v. Barrington

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 28, 1984
319 S.E.2d 894 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Carter v. Barrington

Case Details

Full title:CARTER et al. v. BARRINGTON

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 28, 1984

Citations

319 S.E.2d 894 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
319 S.E.2d 894