From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 26, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5525 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5525.

February 26, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2009, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Or, In the Alternative, Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (Document No. 8), the defendant's response (Document No. 10), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin (Document No. 12), the lack of any objection to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report is APPROVED and his Recommendation is ADOPTED ;

Although we approve and adopt the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, we do not join in his characterization that the ALJ "acted in clear dereliction of her duty to explicitly weigh such evidence." We conclude that the ALJ merely failed to properly discuss and weigh the records from the Northeast Treatment Centers and the GAF scores.

2. The plaintiff's Request for Review is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and

3. This case is REMANDED pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Carter v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 26, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5525 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Carter v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DONNA L. CARTER v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 26, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5525 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2009)