From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. American Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Sep 13, 1983
279 S.C. 368 (S.C. 1983)

Summary

holding that a bad faith refusal to pay first party benefits claim "does not extend to a person who is not a party to or a named insured under the insurance contract and who possesses a mere contingent interest, such as an inchoate dower interest, in the property insured"

Summary of this case from Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Bolden

Opinion

21987

September 13, 1983.

Ray L. Derrick, of Funderburk Derrick, Columbia, for appellant. Jeter E. Rhodes Jr., of Whaley, McCutchen, Blanton Rhodes, Columbia, for respondent.


Sept. 13, 1983.


Appellant Diane Carter brought this action against respondent American Mutual Fire Insurance Company for bad faith refusal to pay benefits allegedly due under a policy of fire insurance. Respondent's demurrer was sustained by the trial judge. We affirm.

The home in which Mrs. Carter lived with her husband, Richard E. Carter, was partially destroyed by fire. Appellant's husband timely notified respondent of his loss. Respondent refused to compensate Mr. Carter for the loss. Mr. and Mrs. Carter brought separate actions against respondent.

Mrs. Carter's complaint alleged bad faith refusal to pay insurance benefits which resulted in damage to her inchoate dower interest in the real property and in severe emotional distress. Respondent demurred to the complaint on the ground that Mrs. Carter was not a named insured under the contract of insurance and her inchoate dower interest did not give her the right to enforce the contract.

The trial judge sustained the demurrer. Mrs. Carter appeals.

Although this Court recently recognized a cause of action for bad faith refusal to pay first party benefits due under an insurance contract, Richard E. Carter v. American Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 307 S.E.2d 225, filed contemporaneously with this opinion; Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 306 S.E.2d 616 (1983), this cause of action does not extend to a person who is not a party to or a named insured under the insurance contract and who possesses a mere contingent interest, such as an inchoate dower interest, in the property insured.

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the trial judge.

LEWIS, C.J., NESS and HARWELL, JJ., and PAUL M. MOORE, Acting Associate Justice, concur.


Summaries of

Carter v. American Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Sep 13, 1983
279 S.C. 368 (S.C. 1983)

holding that a bad faith refusal to pay first party benefits claim "does not extend to a person who is not a party to or a named insured under the insurance contract and who possesses a mere contingent interest, such as an inchoate dower interest, in the property insured"

Summary of this case from Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Bolden

In Carter v. American Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 279 S.C. 368, 307 S.E.2d 227 (1983), a fire partially destroyed the home of Diane Carter and her husband, Richard E. Carter.

Summary of this case from Kleckley v. Northwestern Nat. Cas. Co.
Case details for

Carter v. American Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Diane CARTER, Appellant, v. AMERICAN MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Sep 13, 1983

Citations

279 S.C. 368 (S.C. 1983)
307 S.E.2d 227

Citing Cases

Kleckley v. Northwestern Nat. Cas. Co.

On the other hand, our courts have refused to recognize a Nichols claim by third parties. See, e.g., Carter…

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Bolden

Bad Faith ClaimTurning to the Estate's bad faith claim, AO relies on Kleckley v. Nw. Nat. Cas. Co., 498…