(Citation omitted.) Cartaya v. State, 176 Ga. App. 404, 405 ( 336 S.E.2d 324) (1985). MIKELL, Judge.
Upon review of the entire record, we find there was sufficient evidence adduced at trial from which any rational trior of fact could have found proof of appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979); Cartaya v. State, 176 Ga. App. 404, 405 ( 336 S.E.2d 324) (1985). 3. The State called one of the investigating officers as its witness.
A trial court has broad discretion in ruling on a motion for a mistrial, and this court will not disturb such ruling in the absence of a manifest abuse of that discretion which threatens the defendant's right to a fair trial. See McCormick v. State, 152 Ga. App. 14 ( 262 S.E.2d 173) (1979); Cartaya v. State, 176 Ga. App. 404 (2) ( 336 S.E.2d 324) (1985). We find the trial court's remedial instructions to the jury in the present case sufficient to insure Weaver's right to a fair trial.
Johnson v. State, 238 Ga. 59, 61 ( 230 S.E.2d 869) (1976). See Cartaya v. State, 176 Ga. App. 404 ( 336 S.E.2d 324) (1985). This enumeration is also without merit.
"In a condemnation action the state must first carry its burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence to establish a prima facie case for the forfeiture of the property. Bloodworth v. State (of Ga.), 185 Ga. App. 880 ( 336 S.E.2d 324) (1988)." State of Ga. v. Banks, 215 Ga. App. 828, 831 (2), 832 ( 452 S.E.2d 533).
"In a condemnation action the state must first carry its burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence to establish a prima facie case for forfeiture of the property. Bloodworth v. State [of Ga.], 185 Ga. App. 880 ( 336 S.E.2d 324) (1988). A [claimant] invoking the innocent owner exception has a two-fold burden.