From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carsten v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Jan 3, 2024
380 So. 3d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

No. 1D2023-1523

01-03-2024

Brian K. CARSTEN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Brian K. Carsten, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

Brian K. Carsten, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) (dismissing the petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had given the petitioner a ruling on the pending pleading below).

Roberts, Rowe, and Ray, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carsten v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Jan 3, 2024
380 So. 3d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

Carsten v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brian K. Carsten, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Jan 3, 2024

Citations

380 So. 3d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)