From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carson v. EEOC of Mobile

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Mar 7, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-00219-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Mar. 7, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-00219-KD-MU

03-07-2022

TINA J. CARSON, Plaintiff, v. EEOC OF MOBILE, Defendant.


ORDER

KRISTI K. DuBOSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated February 3, 2022, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for insufficient process and insufficient service of process.

DONE and ORDERED this the 7th day of March 2022.


Summaries of

Carson v. EEOC of Mobile

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Mar 7, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-00219-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Mar. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Carson v. EEOC of Mobile

Case Details

Full title:TINA J. CARSON, Plaintiff, v. EEOC OF MOBILE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Mar 7, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-00219-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Mar. 7, 2022)