From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carson City v. The Travelers Indemity Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 13, 2022
3:22-cv-00006 LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00006 LRH-CLB

01-13-2022

CARSON CITY, a consolidated municipality and political subdivision of the State of Nevada, Plaintiff, v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut Corporation, ROE COMPANIES I-X, and DOE INDIVIDUALS I-X, Defendants.

TIMOTHY F. HUNTER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 010622 M. KEITH MOSKOWITZ, ESQ. (Pro Hoc Vice Pending) JULIA M. BECKLEY, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice Pending) RAY LEGO & ASSOCIATES Attorney for Defendant, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY LEMONS, GRUNDY & EISENBERG Douglas R Brown Esq. (SBN 7620) Dane A. Littlefield, Esq. (SBN 14080) Attorneys for Plaintiff Carson City


TIMOTHY F. HUNTER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 010622

M. KEITH MOSKOWITZ, ESQ. (Pro Hoc Vice Pending)

JULIA M. BECKLEY, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice Pending)

RAY LEGO & ASSOCIATES

Attorney for Defendant, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY

LEMONS, GRUNDY & EISENBERG

Douglas R Brown Esq. (SBN 7620)

Dane A. Littlefield, Esq. (SBN 14080)

Attorneys for Plaintiff Carson City

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

The Parties, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby jointly request that the Court extend the deadline by which Defendant shall have to respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed the Complaint in the First Judicial District court for the State of Nevada in and for Carson City on November 17, 2021.

2. Defendant was served on December 9, 2021.

3. Defendant's deadline for answering or otherwise responding to the Complaint was December 30, 2021.

4. On December 23, 2021, given the holidays surrounding the response deadline, Defendant requested that Plaintiff agree to a thirty day extension to respond to the Complaint. On December 27, 2021, Plaintiff agreed that Defendant may have an additional thirty (30) days to respond to the Complaint. Accordingly, the Parties agreed that Defendant may have until January 28, 2022 to respond to the Complaint.

5. Defendant removed the case to this Court on January 7, 2022. ECF 1.

6. Despite the removal to federal court, the Parties wish to maintain their previously agreed deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint as January 28, 2022.

7. Plaintiff consents to the relief requested in this Stipulation.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts set forth above, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be January 28, 2022; and

2. Defendant does not waive any defenses to the Complaint or its right to move to dismiss or otherwise move on the Complaint.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Having consider the Stipulated Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (“Stipulated Motion”), and for good cause shown, the Stipulated Motion is hereby GRANTED.

The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be January 28, 2022. Defendant does not waive any defenses to the Complaint or its right to move to dismiss or otherwise move on the Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carson City v. The Travelers Indemity Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 13, 2022
3:22-cv-00006 LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Carson City v. The Travelers Indemity Co.

Case Details

Full title:CARSON CITY, a consolidated municipality and political subdivision of the…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 13, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00006 LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2022)