From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carruth v. Fondren

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 17, 2009
Civil No. 08-943 (DWF/JJK) (D. Minn. Mar. 17, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-943 (DWF/JJK).

March 17, 2009

Quatros Deshano Carruth, Pro Se, Petitioner.

Jeffrey S. Paulsen and Leshia M. Lee-Dixon, Assistant United States Attorneys, counsel for Respondent.


ORDER


The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated February 9, 2009. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Petition of Quatros Deshanno Carruth for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1), is DENIED; and

2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Carruth v. Fondren

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 17, 2009
Civil No. 08-943 (DWF/JJK) (D. Minn. Mar. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Carruth v. Fondren

Case Details

Full title:Quatros Deshanno Carruth, Petitioner, v. Warden Dwight Fondren, Federal…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Mar 17, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-943 (DWF/JJK) (D. Minn. Mar. 17, 2009)

Citing Cases

Rusan v. Chester

This sequence of events demonstrates that petitioner had adequate notice of the revisions prior to the…

Jacobs v. Barnes

As to the revision of the incident report, an incident report that is revised to provide greater specificity…