From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Weill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 2003
2 A.D.3d 152 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2371, 2371A.

December 4, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered October 17, 2002, which dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered October 8, 2002, which granted defendants' cross motion to dismiss, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Bradley R. Mathews, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Carmine D. Boccuzzi, for Defendants-Respondents.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Williams, JJ.


Delaware, the state of incorporation, where shareholder derivative actions challenging these same transactions were already being litigated, has a paramount interest in claims involving the corporation's internal affairs ( see Sturman v. Singer, 213 A.D.2d 324; Hart v. General Motors Corp., 129 A.D.2d 179, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 608).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Carroll v. Weill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 2003
2 A.D.3d 152 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Carroll v. Weill

Case Details

Full title:SHARON CARROLL, ETC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SANFORD I. WEILL, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 4, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 152 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 627

Citing Cases

Wallert v. Ballance

"[T]he law of the state in which an entity was incorporated ... is controlling as to matters relating to its…

L.P., v. Slaine

Plaintiffs, shareholders of defendant Rand Publishing Co., allege, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty and…