From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 10, 2008
254 S.W.3d 912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 89859.

June 10, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, James R. Hartenbach, Judge.

Jessica Hathaway, Saint Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.



ORDER


Movant, Brion Carroll, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to properly cross-examine a witness.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Carroll v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 10, 2008
254 S.W.3d 912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Carroll v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brion CARROLL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jun 10, 2008

Citations

254 S.W.3d 912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)