From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 5, 2001
749 N.E.2d 293 (Ohio 2001)

Opinion

No. 01-83.

Submitted May 16, 2001.

Decided July 5, 2001.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Holmes County, No. 99CA016.

Scanlon Gearinger Co., L.P.A., Robert A. Royer and Joy D. Malek, for appellant.

Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley Howley L.L.P., Timothy D. Johnson, Gregory E. O'Brien and Shawn W. Maestle, for appellee.


The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

The cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our decisions in Littrell and Clark.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.


I respectfully dissent based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.


Summaries of

Carroll v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 5, 2001
749 N.E.2d 293 (Ohio 2001)
Case details for

Carroll v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Carroll, Appellant, v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 5, 2001

Citations

749 N.E.2d 293 (Ohio 2001)
749 N.E.2d 293

Citing Cases

Cordle v. Jackson

See Clark, supra at syllabus; and Littrell, supra. We note further that appellants' reliance on Heilman v.…

Carroll v. Allstate Ins. Co.

We reach this conclusion for the following reasons. {¶ 45} First, in the case of Marline Carroll v.…