Carroll v. Nakatani

Full title: John CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. James NAKATANI, in his capacity as…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 14, 2003

80 F. App'x 552 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Argued and Submitted May 9, 2002.

Submission Deferred May 10, 2002.

Resubmitted Oct. 14, 2003. ^*

* Due to a clerical error the case 02-15483, Carroll v Nakatani was included in the order resubmitting theses cases filed October 14, 2003. 02-15483 is not resubmitted.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3) [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; David A. Ezra, Chief District Judge, Presiding.

John W. Goemans, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William Helfand, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee/Plaintiff-Appellant.

Walter R. Schoettle, Emmett Lee Loy, Honolulu, HI, for Intervenors-Appellants.

Charleen M. Aina, DAG, Girard D. Lau, DAG, Office of the Attorney General, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants-Appellees.

Patrick W. Hanifin, Im Hanifin Parsons, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Sherry P. Broder, Davies Pacific Center, Philip W. Miyoshi, McCorriston, Miller, Mukai, MacKinnon LLP, Arnold L. Lum, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee.

Before WALLACE, TASHIMA, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In Carroll v. Nakatani, 342 F.3d 934 (9th Cir.2003), this court affirmed the district court's dismissal for lack of standing of plaintiff's underlying action. Accordingly, appellants' motion to intervene in that action has been rendered moot. This appeal is therefore dismissed on account of mootness. No costs.

APPEAL DISMISSED.