Carroll v. Lambris

Full title: DAVID and KIM CARROLL, Plaintiffs, v. THAD LAMBRIS, JOSE RAMIREZ, STEPHEN…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 6, 2005

Case No. 04-71655 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 6, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 04-71655.

October 6, 2005

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CLARK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DE 70], GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS VILLAGE OF OXFORD'S AND THAD LAMBRIS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DE 71], DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DE 72], AND DENYING DEFENDANT RAMIREZ'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DE 73]

ARTHUR TARNOW, District Judge

Before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed by the parties in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 5, 2005, the Court heard oral arguments as to all of the motions. For the reasons stated on the record at the motion hearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Clark's motion for summary judgment [DE 70] is DENIED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Village of Oxford and Thad Lambris's motion for summary judgment [DE 71] is GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS AGAINST THE VILLAGE OF OXFORD ONLY;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Village of Oxford and Thad Lambris's motion for summary judgment [DE 71] is DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS AGAINST THAD LAMBRIS;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment [DE 72] is DENIED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ramirez's motion for summary judgment [DE 73] is DENIED.