From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Lamas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 16, 2013
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-5697 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-5697

01-16-2013

CHRISTOPHER CARROLL, Petitioner, v. MARIROSA LAMAS, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 16 day of January, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, and Petitioner's Objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 10) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 3) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING;
4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability; and
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG , J.


Summaries of

Carroll v. Lamas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 16, 2013
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-5697 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Carroll v. Lamas

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER CARROLL, Petitioner, v. MARIROSA LAMAS, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 16, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-5697 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 2013)