From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 27, 2019
268 So. 3d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D17-2535

02-27-2019

ROOSEVELT CARROLL, JR., Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Roosevelt Carroll, Jr., pro se, Petitioner. Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections; Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Roosevelt Carroll, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections; Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REQUEST FOR A WRITTEN OPINION

Per Curiam.

We deny Petitioner's motion for rehearing, grant his request for a written opinion, and withdraw our opinion issued on December 12, 2018, and substitute the following opinion in its place:

DISMISSED . See Dickerson v. State , 204 So.3d 544 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) ; Brown v. State , 197 So.3d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Osterhaus, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carroll v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 27, 2019
268 So. 3d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Carroll v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:ROOSEVELT CARROLL, JR., Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 27, 2019

Citations

268 So. 3d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)