From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Dosier

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Apr 16, 2013
No. 1:12cv1176 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:12cv1176

04-16-2013

TREMAYNE WENDELL CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. MR. KINGSLEY DOSIER, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER

On November 13, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed, and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections within the time permitted by section 636. (Doc. 6.)

The court has reviewed those portions of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected and made a de novo determination. To the extent Plaintiff has raised new evidence in his objections, the court declines to consider it. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court's review is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, which is therefore adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is filed and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint on the proper § 1983 forms.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

Thomas D. Schroeder

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Carroll v. Dosier

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Apr 16, 2013
No. 1:12cv1176 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Carroll v. Dosier

Case Details

Full title:TREMAYNE WENDELL CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. MR. KINGSLEY DOSIER, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Apr 16, 2013

Citations

No. 1:12cv1176 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2013)