From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Court of Common Pleas Phila. Cnty.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 29, 2013
67 A.3d 788 (Pa. 2013)

Opinion

No. 33 EM 2013.

2013-05-29

Preston CARROLL, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent.


ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2013, the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief” is DENIED.


Summaries of

Carroll v. Court of Common Pleas Phila. Cnty.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 29, 2013
67 A.3d 788 (Pa. 2013)
Case details for

Carroll v. Court of Common Pleas Phila. Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Preston CARROLL, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: May 29, 2013

Citations

67 A.3d 788 (Pa. 2013)

Citing Cases

Pearlman v. Pittsburgh

The specifications here are, as indeed they must be, if possible, such as to afford reasonable opportunity…

Guthrie v. Armstrong

Error assigned, inter alia, was decree, quoting it. Charles F. C. Arensberg, of Patterson, Crawford,…