From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. CDCR

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 29, 2023
1:22-cv-00363-JLT-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00363-JLT-BAM (PC)

08-29-2023

TREMAINE CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(Doc. 24)

Tremaine Carroll is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

The assigned magistrate judge screened the first amended complaint and directed Plaintiff to either file a second amended complaint or notify the Court of her willingness to proceed on the cognizable claims identified by the Court. (Doc. 17.) Following two extensions of time, the deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint or a notice of her willingness to proceed on the cognizable claims identified expired, and Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court's orders.

Therefore, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to obey a Court order and failure to prosecute. (Doc. 24.) The Court served the findings and recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days after service. (Id. at 3-4.)


Summaries of

Carroll v. CDCR

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 29, 2023
1:22-cv-00363-JLT-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Carroll v. CDCR

Case Details

Full title:TREMAINE CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 29, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-00363-JLT-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2023)