From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll Graham Glass Co. v. Stattman

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Mar 11, 1941
309 Ill. App. 132 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,025. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed March 11, 1941

CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT, § 56vacation, note lacking consideration. Judgment by confession should have been vacated, where it appeared that the note lacked consideration because money was given defendant by plaintiff for salary, traveling expenses and raw materials while defendant developed patents owned by plaintiff, and there was no evidence that defendant was to be personally liable for such payments.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. JOHN J. ROONEY, presiding.

Judgment reversed, and cause remaned for a new trial. Heard in second division, first district, this court at February term, 1940.

Hugh Moore Matchett, Louis Greenberg and Clarence W. Shaeffer, for appellants.

No appearance for appellee.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed March 11, 1941.


Summaries of

Carroll Graham Glass Co. v. Stattman

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Mar 11, 1941
309 Ill. App. 132 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
Case details for

Carroll Graham Glass Co. v. Stattman

Case Details

Full title:Carroll Graham Glass Company, Appellee, v. Walter A. Stattman and Mary A…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Mar 11, 1941

Citations

309 Ill. App. 132 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)
32 N.E.2d 930