From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll County v. Payton

U.S.
Oct 6, 2003
540 U.S. 812 (2003)

Summary

holding that a court should decide class certification first and treat the class as the relevant entity for Article III purposes

Summary of this case from Martinez v. Newsom

Opinion

No. 02-1584.

October 6, 2003.


C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 308 F. 3d 673.


Summaries of

Carroll County v. Payton

U.S.
Oct 6, 2003
540 U.S. 812 (2003)

holding that a court should decide class certification first and treat the class as the relevant entity for Article III purposes

Summary of this case from Martinez v. Newsom
Case details for

Carroll County v. Payton

Case Details

Full title:CARROLL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ET AL. v. PAYTON ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 6, 2003

Citations

540 U.S. 812 (2003)

Citing Cases

Murphy v. United Services Auto Assn.

See Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp., 527 U.S. 815, 830-31 (1999); Amchem Prods., Inc., 521 U.S. 591, 612-13 (1997);…

Martinez v. Newsom

Given these developments in standing doctrine, it is hard to imagine a juridical link exception to Article…