Opinion
2:17-cv-01837-RFB-VCF
02-16-2023
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, a California corporation, Plaintiff v. DEVONRIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Nevada corporation; SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Defendants.
KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886 ANA P. MURGUIA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 16284 HANKS LAW GROUP Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC Akerman LLP KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886 7 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC . Hanks Law Group NATALIE L. WINSLOW, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12125 SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12016 Attorneys for Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886 ANA P. MURGUIA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 16284 HANKS LAW GROUP Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
Akerman LLP KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886 7 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC .
Hanks Law Group NATALIE L. WINSLOW, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12125 SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12016 Attorneys for Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO ASSIGN RENTS (FIRST REQUEST)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) and Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC (“Carrington”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that SFR shall have and additional 10 days, up to and including February 23, 2023 to file a response to Carrington's Motion to Assign Rents [ECF No. 96], which was initially due on February 10, 2023.
Good cause exists to extend SFR's deadline to respond because SFR just recently became aware that the pending motion was filed and will need additional time to evaluate the contents of the motion and adequately respond.
This matter is currently on appeal. Hanks Law Group was retained as counsel after the appeal had been filed, thus Hanks Law Group did not substitute in as counsel in this underlying District Court case. Consequently, SFR's counsel did not receive notice of the filing via the CM/ECF system. Hanks Law Group is filing a Substitution of Attorneys today so as to remedy that issue.
This is the parties' first requested extension of this deadline and this request is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.