Carrillo v. State

4 Citing cases

  1. Ibarra v. State

    No. 13-04-00547-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2005)

    To preserve a complaint for appellate review, the complaining party must not only make a request, objection, or motion to the trial court, the request must be timely. See Tex.R.App.P. 33.1(a)(1); Carrillo v. State, 29 S.W.3d 262, 263 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. ref'd). Fairness requires the complaining party to raise the complaint when it is possible to correct the error.

  2. White v. State

    No. 05-01-01620-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 19, 2003)   Cited 4 times
    Reforming trial court's "clearly incorrect" notations of "N/A" in regard to enhancement paragraphs to show pleas and findings of true to enhancement paragraphs

    To preserve a complaint for appellate review, the complaining party must make a timely request, objection or motion to the trial court. See Tex.R.App.P. 33.1(a)(1); Carrillo v. State, 29 S.W.3d 262, 263 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. ref'd). Fairness requires the complaining party to raise the complaint when it is possible to correct the error.

  3. State v. Dotson

    224 S.W.3d 199 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)   Cited 20 times
    Involving an indictment

    The appellant never complained that the procedural requirements under Article 21.25 were not satisfied. See Carrillo v. State, 29 S.W.3d 262, 263-64 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. ref'd), on remand from 2 S.WJ d 275 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999) (holding that one must object to any perceived procedural defect in the substitution of an indictment to preserve the error for appeal). Nor did he make any such challenge in the court of appeals.

  4. Tarvin v. State

    NO. 01-08-00449-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 25, 2011)   Cited 2 times

    An appellant who wishes to complain that the procedural requirements of Article 21.25 were not satisfied must raise the issue. See Carrillo v. State, 29 S.W.3d 262, 263-64 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. ref'd). Because appellant did not raise the issue in his application for habeas relief, the issue is not preserved for appeal.