Opinion
No. 12-71179 Agency No. A070-915-954
2013-10-07
MIGUEL CARRILLO, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
On Petition for Review of an Order of
The Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 11, 2013
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
San Francisco, California
Before: ALARCÓN and BERZON, Circuit Judges; and ZOUHARY, District Judge.
The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
--------
The only claim in his Petition is that Carrillo's conviction of an aggravated felony was invalid because of ineffective assistance of counsel. That contention "is no longer supportable," because Chaidez v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 1103 (2013), held Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2009), non-retroactive. Pet'r's Suppl. Br. at 5.
DENIED.