From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrigan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
May 8, 2013
CASE NO. C13-276 RAJ (W.D. Wash. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. C13-276 RAJ

05-08-2013

JAMES L. CARRIGAN, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al. Defendants.


HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES


ORDER

This matter comes before the court sua sponte. On February 20, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Dkt. # 9. The motion was noted for consideration on March 22, 2013. To-date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition. The court ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why the court should not grant defendants' motion to dismiss in its entirety for failure to oppose. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2). Plaintiff shall respond within five days of this order.

_________________

The Honorable Richard A. Jones

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Carrigan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
May 8, 2013
CASE NO. C13-276 RAJ (W.D. Wash. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Carrigan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. CARRIGAN, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. C13-276 RAJ (W.D. Wash. May. 8, 2013)