From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carriero v. Iovino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 13, 1953
281 App. Div. 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

May 13, 1953.

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Present — Foster, P.J., Brewster, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.


The complaint is laid in negligence arising out of an automobile accident. Defendant's contention on the motion was that both parties were employees of the General Electric Company, engaged in the course of their employment at the time the accident happened, and that plaintiff's sole remedy was under the Workmen's Compensation Law. The Special Term held that an issue of fact was presented as to whether plaintiff was acting within the scope of his employment at the time the accident occurred. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.


Summaries of

Carriero v. Iovino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 13, 1953
281 App. Div. 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Carriero v. Iovino

Case Details

Full title:PETER A. CARRIERO, Respondent, v. PHILIP IOVINO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 13, 1953

Citations

281 App. Div. 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Morris v. Luck

(See, also, Rauch v. Jones, supra, p. 596; Roberts v. Gagnon, 1 A.D.2d 297, 301.) The defense that…

Laskoski v. De Mers

" In the instant case a question of fact is presented upon this issue. (Cf. Carriero v. Iovino, 281 App. Div.…