From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrick v. Santa Cruz Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
May 14, 2013
Case No.: 12-CV-03852-LHK (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 12-CV-03852-LHK

05-14-2013

PAUL M. CARRICK, Plaintiff, v. SANTA CRUZ COUNTY AND SANTA CRUZ COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR KATHLEEN PREVISICH; COUNTY SUPERVISORS NEAL COONERTY, JOHN LEOPOLD, ELLEN PIRIE, GREG CAPUT, MARK STONE; SANTA CRUZ COUNTY COUNSEL DANA MCRAE, TAMYRA RICE; SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR SUSAN MAURIELLO; SANTA CRUZ COUNTY RECORDER SEAN SALDAVIA; DOES 1-25, Defendants.


ORDER VACATING HEARING ON

DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION TO

DISMISS

A hearing on Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for May 16, 2013. See ECF No. 91. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for determination without oral argument and accordingly VACATES the May 16, 2013 hearing. The Court will issue an order on the motion shortly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Carrick v. Santa Cruz Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
May 14, 2013
Case No.: 12-CV-03852-LHK (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Carrick v. Santa Cruz Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL M. CARRICK, Plaintiff, v. SANTA CRUZ COUNTY AND SANTA CRUZ COUNTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: May 14, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 12-CV-03852-LHK (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)