From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrethers v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C-09-1101 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. C-09-1101 EMC

11-17-2011

KENNETH CARRETHERS, Plaintiff, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN

LIMINE #1

In the Court's Final Pretrial Conference Order, Docket No. 80, the Court stated the following in ruling on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #1:

In their first motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to exclude any evidence of Plaintiff's prior arrests, convictions, and previous drug and alcohol use. Defendants do not oppose the motion, although they would seek to introduce it as rebuttal "should Plaintiff introduce evidence, in whatever form, affirmatively suggesting the absence of a prior history of arrests, convictions and drug and alcohol use." Opp. at 1. The Court therefore GRANTS the motion to exclude this evidence, although it will not bar Plaintiffs from moving to introduce the evidence if Defendants open the door to such evidence.
The Court hereby clarifies that the last sentence should state, "The Court therefore GRANTS the motion to exclude this evidence, although it will not bar Defendants from moving to introduce the evidence if Plaintiff opens the door to such evidence."

IT IS SO ORDERED.

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Carrethers v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C-09-1101 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Carrethers v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH CARRETHERS, Plaintiff, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

No. C-09-1101 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)