From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrero v. Carrero

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 9, 1986
493 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 86-1819.

September 9, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Fredricka G. Smith, J.

George C. Vogelsang and Deborah White, Miami, for appellant.

Maurice J. Kutner, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ.


We find no abuse of discretion in a trial judge failing to require a residential or custodial parent to reside in the State of Florida when the residential parent and the minor children had, prior to the entry of the final judgment, moved to a foreign state where the residential parent had relatives, there being no court order requiring said parent to remain in the state pending the litigation and the noncustodial parent agreeing that the residential parent was the proper person to have custody of the children. See and compare Matilla v. Matilla, 474 So.2d 306 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Carrero v. Carrero

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 9, 1986
493 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Carrero v. Carrero

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR R. CARRERO, APPELLANT, v. DARBY R. CARRERO, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 9, 1986

Citations

493 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Martin v. Martin

The husband did not request such relief, and orders restricting relocation fall under the same abuse of…