From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrasquillo v. O'Donnel

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 11, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-347 (W.D. Pa. May. 11, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-347.

May 11, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2010, the Court having entered an Order [Doc 2] granting the Plaintiff's Motion for IFP status [Doc. 1], docketed his Complaint [3], entered an Order dismissing certain Defendants [11], and ordered that the Marshall serve the remaining Defendant per the plaintiff's direction [18], the Marshal's Office filed a Return of Service Unexecuted. as to that Defendant. The Court then entered an Order [23] directing the Plaintiff to provide the Court with proper instructions for service on the Defendant on or before March 30, 2010. The Plaintiff failed to do so. On April 22, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation [25], which was sent to the Plaintiff, recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by May 10, 2010. No objections were filed.

Therefore, upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [25], which is adopted as the Opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to mark this case closed.


Summaries of

Carrasquillo v. O'Donnel

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 11, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-347 (W.D. Pa. May. 11, 2010)
Case details for

Carrasquillo v. O'Donnel

Case Details

Full title:DAVID CARRASQUILLO, Plaintiff v. CORRECTION OFFICER O'DONNEL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 11, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-347 (W.D. Pa. May. 11, 2010)