Opinion
17 CV 9643 (VB)
06-07-2022
JOSE CARRASCO, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS GRIFFIN, Defendant.
ORDER
VINCENT L. BRICCETTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court is in receipt of a letter from plaintiff, dated May 31, 2022 (which will be separately docketed), seeking a six-month extension of his deadline to oppose defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #87) due to certain health issues that have prevented plaintiff from preparing his opposition.
The Court is satisfied that plaintiff has shown good cause for an extension. Accordingly, plaintiff's request is GRANTED. Plaintiff's time to oppose the pending motion is extended to December 6, 2022. This is the second extension granted to plaintiff (see Doc. #96).
If plaintiff fails to oppose the motion by December 6, 2022, the Court will deem the motion fully submitted and unopposed. The Court is not likely to grant any further extensions.
Finally, plaintiff mailed his May 31 letter directly to Chambers. Going forward, plaintiff must address all future correspondence to the Pro Se Clerk at the following address:
Pro Se Clerk United States District Court 300 Quarropas St. White Plains, NY 10601
The Court will disregard any future submissions sent directly to Chambers. To be clear, the Court will return to plaintiff all future submissions sent directly to Chambers.
Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket.
SO ORDERED: