From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carranza v. Suglich

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 19, 2022
3:14-cv-00773-GPC-AGS (S.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2022)

Opinion

3:14-cv-00773-GPC-AGS

12-19-2022

SELVIN O. CARRANZA, Plaintiff, v. W. SUGLICH, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO BIFURCATE PUNITIVE DAMAGES

Jinsook Ohta United States District Court

The Court received the Parties' Joint Motion to bifurcate punitive damages, preclude evidence of settlement discussions, preclude evidence of appointment of Plaintiff s Counsel, and preclude evidence of indemnification. For good cause shown, the Joint Motion is GRANTED as follows:

1. Trial in this matter shall be bifurcated: Phase One shall concern liability determinations, Plaintiff s entitlement to relief, amount of non-punitive damages and entitlement to punitive damages; Phase Two shall concern the amount of punitive damages, should the jury find Plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages. The same jury deciding liability and entitlement to damages shall determine the amount of punitive damages to the extent the jury finds that Plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carranza v. Suglich

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 19, 2022
3:14-cv-00773-GPC-AGS (S.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Carranza v. Suglich

Case Details

Full title:SELVIN O. CARRANZA, Plaintiff, v. W. SUGLICH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Dec 19, 2022

Citations

3:14-cv-00773-GPC-AGS (S.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2022)