From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrano v. Carrano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 2011
82 A.D.3d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-06239.

March 29, 2011.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated February 28, 2008, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kent, J.), dated May 21, 2010, as denied, in part, her motion to resettle stated portions of the judgment of divorce.

The Sallah Law Firm, P.C., Holtsville, N.Y. (Patrick M. Kerr of counsel), for appellant.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of a judgment ( see Vogelgesang v Vogelgesang, 71 AD3d 1131; Celauro v Celauro, 286 AD2d 471; Schanback v Schanback, 159 AD2d 498, 500; Blaustein v Blaustein, 145 AD2d 591).


Summaries of

Carrano v. Carrano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 2011
82 A.D.3d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Carrano v. Carrano

Case Details

Full title:TONIANNE CARRANO, Appellant, v. MICHAEL CARRANO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 29, 2011

Citations

82 A.D.3d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 2616
919 N.Y.S.2d 376

Citing Cases

Markowitz v. Markowitz

ORDERED that the amended judgment of divorce is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting the provision thereof…

Evans v. Bd. of Educ. of Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist.

As the petitioners correctly contend, the Supreme Court incorrectly construed the petitioners' motion as a…