From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Jun 21, 1905
147 Cal. 227 (Cal. 1905)

Opinion

S.F. No. 4338.

June 21, 1905.

PETITION for Writ of Prohibition to the Superior Court of Monterey County. B.V. Sargent, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The petition was denied without appearance for respondent.

John T. Williams, Jesse W. Bryan, Williams, Bryan Carr, and J.H. Andersen, for Petitioner.


This is a petition for a writ of prohibition to restrain the superior court of Monterey County from further proceeding in a suit for partition of lands, of which it is contended that court has no jurisdiction. It appears from the petition that there has been a hearing and submission of the cause and that the judge has directed counsel for the plaintiff to draw findings and the form of an interlocutory decree.

An appeal from such decree, when entered, will afford the defendant in the action — petitioner here — a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy for any injury it may occasion, and for that reason the writ of prohibition should be denied. If it was clear that the court was proceeding in excess of its jurisdiction, and that a trial involving great expense was yet to be gone through, it might be proper to grant the writ in order to save the parties the useless expense, but here all the expense of the trial has already been incurred, and to review the error and correct the excess of jurisdiction, if any there has been, an appeal is just as plain, speedy, adequate, and effective as prohibition.

Writ denied.


Summaries of

Carr v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Jun 21, 1905
147 Cal. 227 (Cal. 1905)
Case details for

Carr v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:STERLING D. CARR, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY…

Court:Supreme Court of California,In Bank

Date published: Jun 21, 1905

Citations

147 Cal. 227 (Cal. 1905)
81 P. 515

Citing Cases

Plocher v. Superior Court

(21 Cal. Jur. 580; Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. Justice's Court, 192 Cal. 377 [ 220 P. 306].) Where there is a…

Himovitz v. Justice's Court of Sixth Township

It is sufficient for the purpose of this matter to decide that it was within the jurisdiction of the superior…