From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Sep 16, 2011
SCWC-29286 (Haw. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

SCWC-29286

09-16-2011

ANGIE DELIGHT CARR, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee.

Christopher R. Evans on the application for petitioner/defendant-appellant


Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29286 16 SEP-2011 01:18 PM

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CR. NO. 07-1-0549(1))


ORDER STRIKING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: , C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy and McKenna, JJ.)

Having reviewed counsel's response to the order to show cause and the record herein, and it appearing that counsel has not shown good cause as to why his application for writ of certiorari does not comply with HRAP Rule 40.1(d),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of certiorari filed on August 25, 2011 is stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file a writ of certiorari that complies with HRAP Rule 40.1(d) on or by September 20, 2011 if she wishes to continue pursuing her appeal before this court.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 16, 2011. Christopher R. Evans on
the application for
petitioner/defendant-appellant

Mark E. Recktenwald

Paula A. Nakayama

Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

James E. Duffy, Jr.

Sabrina S. McKenna


Summaries of

Carr v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Sep 16, 2011
SCWC-29286 (Haw. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Carr v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANGIE DELIGHT CARR, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE OF HAWAI'I…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

SCWC-29286 (Haw. Sep. 16, 2011)