From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. Smoke

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 25, 2022
Civil Action 1:20-1209 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 25, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:20-1209

02-25-2022

DONALD CARR, Plaintiff v. SMOKE et al., Defendants


ORDER

MALACHY E. MANNION, United States District Judge.

In accordance with the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:

a. Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to all claims against defendants Gourley, Meintel, Varner, Reese, Gregoire, and Newberry.
b. Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to all First and Fourteenth Amendment claims against all Defendants.
c. Defendants' motion is DENIED as to Carr's Eighth Amendment claim of excessive force against defendant Smolke and Carr's Eighth Amendment conditions-of-confinement claim against defendant Brittain.

2. Entry of judgment in accordance with paragraph 1 above will be DEFERRED pending resolution of the remaining claims in this case.

3. Carr's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 36) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Carr v. Smoke

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 25, 2022
Civil Action 1:20-1209 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Carr v. Smoke

Case Details

Full title:DONALD CARR, Plaintiff v. SMOKE et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 25, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:20-1209 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 25, 2022)