From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. Schneider's Estate

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Nov 18, 1943
114 Ind. App. 149 (Ind. Ct. App. 1943)

Opinion

No. 17,154.

Filed November 18, 1943.

1. EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS — Actions — Parties — Representative Necessary. — The estate of a decedent cannot be a party to an action without some representative. p. 150.

2. APPEAL — Assignment of Errors — Names of All Parties to Appeal to Be Set Forth. — The assignment of errors is appellant's complaint on appeal and must contain the names of all parties to the appeal. p. 150.

3. APPEAL — Assignment of Errors — Representative of Estate Not Named — Appeal Dismissed. — Where the only party designated as appellee in the assignment of errors was the estate of a decedent, the appeal was dismissed. p. 150.

From the Cass Circuit Court; John B. Smith, Judge.

Proceedings between Helen E. Carr and the estate of Onie May Schneider. From the judgment entered, the former appealed. Appeal dismissed. By the court in banc.

Charles L. Anderson, Robert T. Miller, and Mae Turner Anderson, all of Logansport, for appellant.

Robert R. David, of Logansport, for appellee.


The only party appellee designates in the assignment of errors is "The Estate of Onie May Schneider, deceased."

The estate of a decedent cannot be a party to an action without some representative. The assignment of errors is appellant's complaint on appeal and must contain the names of all 1-3. parties to the appeal. There being no appellee here this appeal must be dismissed. Dallam v. Stockwell's Estate (1904), 33 Ind. App. 620, 71 N.E. 911.

Appeal dismissed.

NOTE. — Reported in 51 N.E.2d 392.


Summaries of

Carr v. Schneider's Estate

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Nov 18, 1943
114 Ind. App. 149 (Ind. Ct. App. 1943)
Case details for

Carr v. Schneider's Estate

Case Details

Full title:CARR v. SCHNEIDER'S ESTATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana

Date published: Nov 18, 1943

Citations

114 Ind. App. 149 (Ind. Ct. App. 1943)
51 N.E.2d 392

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Estate of W.L. Kings

The effect is the same as if no party appellee had been named in the assignment of errors. Otolski v. Estate…

State ex Rel. Murray v. Est. of Heithecker

It is true that over the course of many years the Courts were strict in the application of the rule requiring…