From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. Purscell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jun 9, 2009
284 S.W.3d 772 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. WD69725.

June 9, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pettis County, Missouri, Robert L. Koffman, Judge.

Mark T. Kempton, for Appellant.

J. Kirk Rahm, for Respondents.

Before Division Three: JAMES M. SMART, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and JAMES E. WELSH, Judge.


ORDER


Benjamin Purscell appeals from a judgment entered against him in the Circuit Court of Pettis County in an action filed by Tim and Amy Carr stemming from an automobile collision involving Purscell and the Carrs. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Carr v. Purscell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jun 9, 2009
284 S.W.3d 772 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Carr v. Purscell

Case Details

Full title:Tim CARR and Amy Carr, Respondents, v. Benjamin J. PURSCELL, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Jun 9, 2009

Citations

284 S.W.3d 772 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)